BOI study shows incentives to firms benefit the country

12/06/04

Permalink 11:29:00, by damageva Email , 452 words, 93 views   English (EU)
Categories: Other, Economic Development

BOI study shows incentives to firms benefit the country

A study by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) showed that the benefits from the incentives granted to both foreign and local investors over a seven-year period outweigh the revenues foregone by the government.

To allay the fears of the Department of Finance (DOF) about the alleged increase in revenues forgone by the government as a result of fiscal incentives extended to investors, the DTI through the Board of Investments (BOI) studied the cost of incentives vis-à-vis net benefits of registered-enterprises.

The study covered, however, only 735 companies that have registered 1,056 projects worth P663 billion from 1995 to 2001 or an average of P95 billion per year over seven years. There are more than 6,000 investment projects that have registered with the BOI since 1987.

Based on annual investments of P95 billion, the difference between the revenues foregone by the government and the revenues generated from these investments amount to P7.62 billion. This after total revenues foregone by the government amounted to P9.4 billion while revenues generated during and after the incentive period or 15 years amounted to P17.02 billion.
For every peso worth of incentive granted, a total of P10.08 worth of investments had been registered with the BOI. Furthermore, for every peso worth of incentive extended by the government would generate P1.54 worth of revenues in 15 years or during and after incentive period.

The revenues generated on the first seven years from BOI-registered companies come from local taxes, license fees, and withholding taxes from employees. Revenues after the incentive period come from income tax holiday, as well as other forms of taxes. Furthermore, the investments resulted in $5.44 billion worth of export earnings at the same time generated employment for 34,000 direct workers.

“With this actual cost-benefit analysis, the issue therefore on whether fiscal incentives are revenue foregone is now rendered moot and academic,” the BOI study stated. The study further stated that fiscal incentives incur costs “but it is too simplistic to conclude that all these costs are in the form of foregone revenue.” “Foregone revenues may be variable costs arising from fiscal incentives in the same that even if granted, if no investment occurs, no revenue foregone can arise in the first place,” the study added.The BOI earlier said the Philippines could not stop providing incentives as the country competes for capital in a region. Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and China offer very generous incentives notwithstanding their world-class infrastructure.

The DTI and the DOF are debating on the proposed rationalization of fiscal incentives through changes in Executive Order 226 otherwise known as the Omnibus Investments Code of 1987, as well as the repeal of other incentives law to have a simplified, consistent, and stable administration of investment incentives policies of all promotion agencies.

by Lawrence Agcaoli

Trackback address for this post:

http://envirovaluation.org/htsrv/trackback.php/348

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Search

Google
Web www.envirovaluation.org
www.costbenefitanalysis.org

Enter your Email to get updates


Powered by FeedBlitz

Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News

Environmental Valuation & Cost Benefit News covers legal, academic, and regulatory developments pertaining to the valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities, such as clean air, trees, parks, congestion, and noise. We apprise the reader about ways in which costs and benefits are measured, and the results of empirical studies. We hope that this information will allow public and private organizations to comprehend the risks and benefits of various actions, help disputants to resolve conflicts equitably and efficiently, and improve the quality of public policies. We will only discuss issues related to the empirical quantification of private and social costs and benefits and damages, and summarize information from daily newspapers, academic journals, legal publications, court decisions, professional newsletters commissioned studies, and on-line services. This newsletter is dedicated to the principal that all policies place values upon life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We believe that more information, explicit specification of assumptions, and rigorous analysis can help our society to better meet these ends. This site will increasingly serve, in conjunction with others, as a valuation database. We will include a wide range of studies, including non-environmental reports, because omission of a factor effectively values it at zero, and biases decisions. Heavy traffic has caused several site crashes. We are attempting to correct these problems. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Categories

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
SUMMARY OF RECENT POSTS

Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News

Misc

Create XML/RSS NewsFeed view this weblog as RSS !

XML Feeds

What is RSS?
Editor and Publisher: Kenneth Acks

Who's Online?

powered by
b2evolution