Abstract: Under the Kyoto Protocol, countries can meet treaty obligations by investing in projects that reduce or sequester greenhouse gases elsewhere. Prior to ratification, treaty participants agreed to launch country-based pilot projects, referred to collectively as Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ), to test novel aspects of the project-related provisions. Relying on a 10-year history of projects, the authors investigate the determinants of AIJ investment. Their findings suggest that national political objectives and possibly deeper cultural ties influenced project selection. This characterization differs from the market-based assumptions that underlie well-known estimates of cost-savings related to the Protocol's flexibility mechanisms. The authors conclude that if approaches developed under the AIJ programs to approve projects are retained, benefits from Kyoto's flexibility provisions will be less than those widely anticipated.
Keywords: abatement, abatement costs, approach, Biological Diversity, carbon, carbon dioxide, carbon offset, carbon taxes, Clean Development Mechanism, Climate Change, cost assumptions, democratic institutions, developed countries, development assistance, discount rate, Economics, emission, emission levels, emission reduction, emission reductions, emissions, environmental, environmental issues, foreign direct investment, foreign investment, fossil, fossil fuels, GDP, global emissions, greenhouse effect, greenhouse gas, greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gases, heating systems, income, international investors, investment activity, investment choices, investment climate, investment decisions, investment flows, investment opportunities, investment projects, investor countries, joint implementation, marginal cost, option value, Ozone Layer, per capita income, pilot projects, pollution, portfolio, present value, private investment, profitability, public funds, quotas, reducing emissions, savings, streams, tons of carbon, tradable permit, tradable permit markets, transaction costs, transition economies, valuation
by Gunnar Breustedt and Donald F. Larson
The World Bank www.worldbank.org
Research Working Paper Number WPS 4131; February 1, 2007; 32 pages
http://go.worldbank.org/587J4ZXFA0
http://envirovaluation.org/htsrv/trackback.php/4586
No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...
Environmental Valuation & Cost Benefit News covers legal, academic, and regulatory developments pertaining to the valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities, such as clean air, trees, parks, congestion, and noise. We apprise the reader about ways in which costs and benefits are measured, and the results of empirical studies. We hope that this information will allow public and private organizations to comprehend the risks and benefits of various actions, help disputants to resolve conflicts equitably and efficiently, and improve the quality of public policies. We will only discuss issues related to the empirical quantification of private and social costs and benefits and damages, and summarize information from daily newspapers, academic journals, legal publications, court decisions, professional newsletters commissioned studies, and on-line services. This newsletter is dedicated to the principal that all policies place values upon life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We believe that more information, explicit specification of assumptions, and rigorous analysis can help our society to better meet these ends. This site will increasingly serve, in conjunction with others, as a valuation database. We will include a wide range of studies, including non-environmental reports, because omission of a factor effectively values it at zero, and biases decisions. Heavy traffic has caused several site crashes. We are attempting to correct these problems. Apologies for any inconvenience.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |