Abstract: The issues of innovations and sustainability are discussed more or less separately, so that risks and potentials of new technologies for a sustainable development often fail to be detected as early as possible.
This article analyses this relationship in light of the development of the nanotechnology funding strategy in Germany which was guided by an integrated approach of technology management activities. This led from technological forecasting activities, the definition of application fields and market surveys to early technological assessment activities and sustainability studies combined with communication measures. The importance of sustainability aspects grew steadily throughout this process, and the integrated approach facilitated the early detection of relevant sustainability issues to be dealt with in the future. This underlines the importance of integrating innovation measures in research funding with work on systematically assessing the sustainability potential of the new technologies.
Keywords: Technological forecasting; Innovation and technology assessment; Research funding; Integrated approach; Public perceptions; Sustainability
by Axel Zweck, Gerd Bachmann, Wolfgang Luther and Christiane Ploetz, all of Future Technologies Division, VDI Technologiezentrum GmbH, P.O. Box 10 11 39, 40002 Duesseldorf, Germany; Fax: +49 211 6214 139.
Journal of Cleaner Production via Elsevier Science Direct www.ScienceDirect.com
Volume 16, Issues 8-9; May-June 2008; Pages 977-987
Special Issue: Sustainable Nanotechnology Development
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.016
http://envirovaluation.org/htsrv/trackback.php/5499
No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...
Environmental Valuation & Cost Benefit News covers legal, academic, and regulatory developments pertaining to the valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities, such as clean air, trees, parks, congestion, and noise. We apprise the reader about ways in which costs and benefits are measured, and the results of empirical studies. We hope that this information will allow public and private organizations to comprehend the risks and benefits of various actions, help disputants to resolve conflicts equitably and efficiently, and improve the quality of public policies. We will only discuss issues related to the empirical quantification of private and social costs and benefits and damages, and summarize information from daily newspapers, academic journals, legal publications, court decisions, professional newsletters commissioned studies, and on-line services. This newsletter is dedicated to the principal that all policies place values upon life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We believe that more information, explicit specification of assumptions, and rigorous analysis can help our society to better meet these ends. This site will increasingly serve, in conjunction with others, as a valuation database. We will include a wide range of studies, including non-environmental reports, because omission of a factor effectively values it at zero, and biases decisions. Heavy traffic has caused several site crashes. We are attempting to correct these problems. Apologies for any inconvenience.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |