Daylight Saving Time Costs Nation $1.7 Billion

03/09/08

Permalink 11:00:21 am, by damageva Email , 260 words, 111 views   English (US)
Categories: Energy, U.S., Regulatory Analysis, Research Institute NGO NonProfit, Costs and Benefits

Daylight Saving Time Costs Nation $1.7 Billion

...
In making the case for expanding daylight saving time, Reps. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Fred Upton, R-Mich. promised Americans it could reduce fossil-fuel consumption by the equivalent of 100,000 barrels of oil a day. It turns out, however, that the 100,000-barrel-a-day estimate was based on outdated data from 1974.

Economists typically value the opportunity cost of a person’s time at his or her wage rate. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the average American’s hourly wage was $17.57 in September 2007. Assuming that it takes everyone 10 minutes to move all of their clocks and watches forward or backward by an hour, the opportunity cost of doing so works out to $2.93 per person. Multiplying that number by the total U.S. population (excluding Arizona) yields a one-time opportunity cost for the nation of just under $860 million—or, to be more precise, $858,274,802. Since clocks must be changed twice every year, this back-of-the-envelope calculation must be doubled, to approximately $1.7 billion annually.
...
[In addition], the time changes interrupt our circadian rhythms—that is, our daily biological patterns—and productivity inevitably falls in the days following the switch, as people report groggily to work.

by William F. Shughart II, Senior Fellow at The Independent Institute, F.A.P. Barnard Distinguished Professor of Economics, holder of the Robert M. Hearin Chair at the University of Mississippi and editor of the Independent Institute book, Taxing Choice: The Predatory Politics of Fiscal Discrimination.

FOR FULL ARTICLE GO TO:
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=2144
The Independent Institute www.independent.org
March 7, 2008

Trackback address for this post:

http://envirovaluation.org/htsrv/trackback.php/5511

Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:

No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...

Leave a comment:

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.

Allowed XHTML tags: <p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small>
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email and url)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will NOT be displayed.))

Search

Google
Web www.envirovaluation.org
www.costbenefitanalysis.org

Enter your Email to get updates


Powered by FeedBlitz

Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News

Environmental Valuation & Cost Benefit News covers legal, academic, and regulatory developments pertaining to the valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities, such as clean air, trees, parks, congestion, and noise. We apprise the reader about ways in which costs and benefits are measured, and the results of empirical studies. We hope that this information will allow public and private organizations to comprehend the risks and benefits of various actions, help disputants to resolve conflicts equitably and efficiently, and improve the quality of public policies. We will only discuss issues related to the empirical quantification of private and social costs and benefits and damages, and summarize information from daily newspapers, academic journals, legal publications, court decisions, professional newsletters commissioned studies, and on-line services. This newsletter is dedicated to the principal that all policies place values upon life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We believe that more information, explicit specification of assumptions, and rigorous analysis can help our society to better meet these ends. This site will increasingly serve, in conjunction with others, as a valuation database. We will include a wide range of studies, including non-environmental reports, because omission of a factor effectively values it at zero, and biases decisions. Heavy traffic has caused several site crashes. We are attempting to correct these problems. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Categories

May 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
SUMMARY OF RECENT POSTS

Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News

Misc

Create XML/RSS NewsFeed view this weblog as RSS !

XML Feeds

What is RSS?
Editor and Publisher: Kenneth Acks

Who's Online?

powered by
b2evolution