Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News
Ecobusinesslinks.com Carbon Offset Survey
04/12/08
04:05:59 pm, by damageva 
, 179 words, 198 views 
Categories: General, Energy, Climate Change GHG Carbon CO2, U.S., U.K., Europe, Companies,CSR,Business,Finance, Australia, New Zealand, Research Institute NGO NonProfit, Free Report at Time of Entry
Ecobusinesslinks.com Carbon Offset Survey
Carbon offsets enable individuals and businesses to reduce the CO2 emissions they are responsible for by offsetting, reducing or displacing the CO2 in another place, typically where it is more economical to do so. Carbon offsets typically include renewable energy, energy efficiency and reforestation projects. As more and more people are concerned about global warming and seeking to reduce their climate impact, carbon offsets, along with personal carbon reductions, provide an important solution to global warming.
Example: a mid-sized 30 mpg car driving 12,000 miles/year will create about 3.55 tons of CO2/year. Using the carbon calculator of one of the companies which are listed here, we figured this would cost only about $19.50 or $1.63/month to be offset!
According to the survey dated April 5, 2008 AtmosClear Climate Club sells methane offsets for $3.96 - $25.00 and Carbonfund.org sell Renewable, Efficiency and Reforestation offsets for $4.30 - 5.50. The survey lists 17 verified/certified and 4 unverified sources along with their Country, Profit/Non-profit status, Projects Type, Project Choice and Offset Type.
Ecobusinesslinks.com www.ecobusinesslinks.com
http://www.ecobusinesslinks.com/carbon_offset_wind_credits_carbon_reduction.htm
Trackback address for this post:
http://envirovaluation.org/htsrv/trackback.php/5613
Comments, Trackbacks, Pingbacks:
No Comments/Trackbacks/Pingbacks for this post yet...
Leave a comment:
Search
Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News
Environmental Valuation & Cost Benefit News covers legal, academic, and regulatory developments pertaining to the valuation of environmental amenities and disamenities, such as clean air, trees, parks, congestion, and noise. We apprise the reader about ways in which costs and benefits are measured, and the results of empirical studies. We hope that this information will allow public and private organizations to comprehend the risks and benefits of various actions, help disputants to resolve conflicts equitably and efficiently, and improve the quality of public policies. We will only discuss issues related to the empirical quantification of private and social costs and benefits and damages, and summarize information from daily newspapers, academic journals, legal publications, court decisions, professional newsletters commissioned studies, and on-line services. This newsletter is dedicated to the principal that all policies place values upon life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. We believe that more information, explicit specification of assumptions, and rigorous analysis can help our society to better meet these ends. This site will increasingly serve, in conjunction with others, as a valuation database. We will include a wide range of studies, including non-environmental reports, because omission of a factor effectively values it at zero, and biases decisions. Heavy traffic has caused several site crashes. We are attempting to correct these problems. Apologies for any inconvenience.
Categories
- All
- Air (1021)
- Climate Change GHG Carbon CO2 (798)
- Energy (1472)
- General (1493)
- Ecosystem Valuation (197)
- Natural Resource Damages (61)
- Recreation (1)
- Land (300)
- Agriculture, Forestry and Food (522)
- Contaminated Properties (550)
- Brownfield Redevelopment (182)
- Green Buildings (340)
- Green Roofs (111)
- Hazardous Waste (114)
- Preservation & Open Space (241)
- Sprawl & Smart Growth (102)
- Waste & Recycling (289)
- Land + Water (112)
- Beach Erosion (20)
- Endangered Species (167)
- Groundwater (96)
- Invasive Species (0)
- Wastewater (3)
- Wetlands (64)
- Natural Hazards (80)
- Floods (58)
- Hurricanes (39)
- Tornadoes (4)
- Weather (18)
- Non-Environmental (331)
- Economic Development (388)
- Education (52)
- Health (328)
- Real Estate Construction Housing (279)
- Transportation (304)
- Water (841)
- zContaminants (1)
- Arsenic (21)
- Asbestos (42)
- Cadmium (10)
- Dioxin (8)
- Flyash (6)
- Lead (52)
- Mercury (52)
- MTBE (24)
- Nitrogen/Nitrates (74)
- Nuclear (50)
- Oil/Gasoline/Benzene (149)
- Ozone (12)
- Particulates (28)
- PCBs (35)
- Perc, TCE (27)
- PVCs (2)
- Sulfur, SO2 (56)
- zLocation (0)
- Africa (94)
- Asia (273)
- Australia, New Zealand (120)
- Canada (101)
- Europe (507)
- Latin America (92)
- U.K. (218)
- U.S. (1154)
- Midwest (244)
- Northeast (72)
- Connecticut (32)
- Massachusetts (61)
- New Jersey (73)
- New York State (54)
- Long Island (21)
- New York City (88)
- Upstate (23)
- Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Dutchess, Orange Counties (18)
- Pennsylvania (65)
- South (127)
- Florida (68)
- Southwest--AZ,TX,NM (41)
- Texas (46)
- TN,KY,AK (0)
- VA,WV,MD,DE (1)
- Washington DC (87)
- West (177)
- California (256)
- Colorado (47)
- Washington & Oregon (28)
- zType (2)
- Academic Study/Journal Article (2065)
- Book (74)
- Companies,CSR,Business,Finance (1151)
- Computer Software/Database (296)
- Conference/Meeting/Seminar (161)
- Contamination Cost (943)
- Cost-Benefit Analysis (407)
- Costs and Benefits (2250)
- Environmental Economics / Ecological Economics (671)
- Free Report at Time of Entry (22)
- Government Report (921)
- Legal, Fines (387)
- Multimedia -- Audio and/or Video (39)
- Newspaper/Mag/TV/Media Story (1765)
- Opinion (Not Likely Ours EV&CBN) (47)
- Press Release (May be biased) (157)
- Regulatory Analysis (1190)
- Research Institute NGO NonProfit (728)
- Savings (619)
- Theory (87)
- zzMethods (14)
- Contingent Valuation, Surveys,.. (256)
- Hedonic Analysis (89)
- Input/Output (32)
- Travel Cost Method (20)
Archives
- May 2008 (20)
- April 2008 (32)
- March 2008 (110)
- February 2008 (106)
- January 2008 (133)
- December 2007 (130)
- November 2007 (100)
- October 2007 (67)
- September 2007 (108)
- August 2007 (80)
- July 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (80)
- More...
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| << < | > >> | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Choose skin
Environmental Valuation & Cost-Benefit News
- 05/10/08: The Effect of Community Gardens on Neighboring Property Values [en-US]
- 05/10/08: Black Beauty Coal Co. to create new wetlands in Indiana as part of settlement with EPA [en-US]
- 05/10/08: Consumer Attitudes toward GM Food and Pesticide Residues in India [en-US]
- 05/10/08: Bicycle-Sharing Program to Be First of Kind in U.S. [en-US]
- 05/10/08: Watching water: A guide to evaluating corporate risks in a thirsty world [en-US]
- 05/10/08: Balancing risk and cost in fuzzy economic dispatch including wind power penetration based on particle swarm optimization [en-US]
- 05/10/08: EPA Advisory Committee Releases Environmental Technology Commercialization Report [en-US]
- 05/10/08: In China City, Protesters See Pollution Risk of New Plant [en-US]
- 05/08/08: A framework for valuing the health benefits of improved bathing water quality in the River Irvine catchment [en-US]
- 05/05/08: Resources For the Future Seminar: Legislation and Regulation Aren't Enough: Challenges in Implementation of Environmental Protection Statutes - Wednesday, May 7, 2008 [en-US]
- 05/05/08: How Can One Allocation Provision Undermine a Cap-and-Trade Program? Section 3902 of the Lieberman-Warner Bill Offers a Warning about Risks in the Allowance Allocation Debate [en-US]
- 05/05/08: Where Does Energy R&D Come From? A First Look at Crowding Out from Environmentally-Friendly R&D; U.S. EPA National Center for Environmental Economics Climate Seminar June 17, 2008 [en-US]
- 05/04/08: Confined Animal Feeding Operations Cost Taxpayers Billions, New Report Finds [en-US]
- 05/04/08: Video Available Resources For the Future Seminar: Curbing Electricity Demand: Who, How - April 9, 2008 [en-US]
- 05/04/08: Moderating effect of forest cover on the effect of proximity to chemical facilities on property values [en-US]
- 05/04/08: Hydrogen no longer a high cost solution to global warming: New ideas [en-US]
- 05/04/08: President Bush realigns hydrogen, fuel cell funding for fiscal 2009 [en-US]
- 05/04/08: A hydrogen energy system and prospects for reducing emissions of fossil fuels pollutants in the Ceará state—Brazil [en-US]
- 05/04/08: Hydropower in Turkey for a clean and sustainable energy future [en-US]
- 05/01/08: Dumb as We Wanna Be [en-US]
- 04/13/08: Energy Efficiency: The First Fuel for a Clean Energy Future: Resources for Meeting Maryland's Electricity Needs [en-US]
- 04/13/08: Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated On a Per Capita Basis? [en-US]
- 04/13/08: Sticks and Carrots for the Design of International Climate Agreements with Renegotiations [en-US]
- 04/12/08: CoStar Study Finds Energy Star, LEED Buildings Outperform Peers: Demand in Marketplace for Sustainability Creates Higher Occupancy Rates, Stronger Rents and Sale Prices in 'Green' Buildings [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Happiness Research and Cost-Benefit Analysis [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Ecobusinesslinks.com Carbon Offset Survey [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Nudge [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Obesity Costs U.S. Companies as Much as $45 Billion a Year, The Conference Board Reports [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Feebates promoting energy-efficient cars: Design options to address more consumers and possible counteracting effects [en-US]
- 04/12/08: Autodesk Launches New Solutions for Building Information Modeling [en-US]
- More posts...
XML Feeds